customer review

ProKennex 2013 Kinetic KM 750 175 Racquet

Comments: I have to disagree with Saleem. I like the feel of this racquet, probably because I like a head heavy frame. It is maneuverable and I feel no vibration, compared to some Ektelon frames I've had. To each his own
From: Joel, Schenectady, NY, USA, 10/13
Skill-level: A
String type and tension: Factory 

Comments: I demoed this racquet along with the FFT 175. I was intrigued by the kinetic technology. However after the first couple of swings I must say I was a little disappointed. First of all the racquet is pretty head heavy and it really felt heavy in my hand. I must say that I was able to generate a good deal of power with the racquet but factoring in the loss of maneuverability and the cost I feel there are better options out there. In fact I was also demoing the Wilson Ugly stick, which I felt generated slightly more power than the KM 750 and costs a lot less. The biggest drawback of the KM 750 was the excessive amount of vibration I felt. Compared to the Ugly stick and the ProKennex FFT 175 this racquet seemed to have way too much vibration. Overall out of the three I found the FFT 175 to be my favorite.
From: Saleem, Avenel, NJ, USA, 07/13
Skill-level: B
String type and tension: Factory




Use this form to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state, and country.







If you prefer, you can email your reviews directly to feedback@racquetballwarehouse.com Please include any relevant information such as string type & tension, skill level, and style of play.
Any information submitted becomes the
property of Racquetball Warehouse.